CANCER CURED: Re: [cancercured] Re: Protocel

dear tony

thank you so much for all this information,much appreciated.

kind regards
bobby
----- Original Message -----
From: dquixote1217
To: cancercured@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 4:50 AM
Subject: [cancercured] Re: Protocel

Bobby -

As far as I know there is no site that compares the success rates of any
of the alternative protocols or cancer fighting items, though certainly
there are a number of sites that mention success rates for one or
another alternative treatment. How accurate those numbers are is
anyone's guess and I have seen several that I consider to be inflated
(there is no end of hype inside and outside the mainstream).

There is no magic bullet that I have found. But there are some good
ones out there and oleander is the best bullet I have found. I have
also found that it is a good idea to have more than one bullet in your
gun.

Based on my own research of thousands of hours and years into oleander
and other alternative treatments, including writing a book about
oleander, oleander has been about as successful overall as anything out
there. Doctor Ozel in Turkey, who was forced to use mainstream surgery,
chemo and/or radiation as a first option and only use oleander after
those had failed, or as a complimentary treatment, had an overall
success rate of 72% for a wide range of cancers.

Marc Swanepoel has distributed his Sutherlandia OPC supplement
containing 80% oleander extract and 20% Sutherlandia frutescens (The
South Africa Cancer Bush) to hundreds of people over the past five plus
years with a wide variety of cancers and stages, many of whom had had
prior mainstream treatments. At last count, three people did not
survive who came to him with only days left to live, five died of major
organ failure who had all had prior chemo and all the rest are still
alive, most of whom are either cancer free or with cancers in remission
or shrinking. Two people stopped the protocol and the cancer returned
and they are now back on it.

In my own Yahoo "Oleandersoup" group, which is over 5 years old now, we
now have almost 1400 members. I am not aware of anyone who had not had
mainstream chemo and/or radiation first who began the suggested
protocol, or even much of it, who is not still alive - and I am aware of
only a handful who did have mainstream treatments first who are not
still alive. Now, many of the members have only been there a couple of
years or less, and many are still fighting their cancers. Also, I have
not tracked all the members to see what they have done or how they have
faired - but the lack of bouncing emails indicates that they are still
around. I do know that we have had many success stories and the record
would appear to be a good one regardless.

Some of our members tried protocel without success before coming to our
group, btw. My main objection, or concern, with protocel, besides
Webster Kehr not ranking it that high, is that it seems to be a tricky
protocol that must be followed pretty exactly and there are just too
many good things I would want to do that it forbids.

To answer your question about what I would do - I would do as much of my
suggested protocol as possible. Likely all of it.

The protocol is posted freely in the group files as well as in my
articles section of my website tbyil.com.

All the best,

Tony