We had a program participant come in five weeks ago. He is 32 years
old and had metastatic melanoma (primary in the scalp) in his
inguinal lymphatics, immediately under the skin is several places,
multiple places in the thorax and abdomen. Prior to coming the
cancer was not contained by benzaldehyde and dipyridamole. He had
two minor surgical procedures, but no radiation nor chemotherapy.
After he (David for those who met him) came he started on pau d'arco
tea, calcitriol, Newcastle disease virus, miltefosine (100 mg/day),
continuation of the dipyridamol (300mg/day), a sialic acid conjugate
vaccine, CaPterin ~1gm/wk (I have permission from the patent owner),
dithiodinicotinic acid 300 mg/day (I have permission from the patent
owner) and a moderately restrictive diet (meat about once week). We
did a PA and lateral chest x-ray at the 5 week mark. The radiologist
did a comparison and could find no evidence of cancer in the x-ray
this week. The largest lesion in the lungs was 3-1/2 cm five weeks
ago and the radiologist no longer sees it.
I don't for one second think the cancer is gone. In this case the
laboring oar was pulled by distortive therapies. Immune therapies
rarely work this quickly, but now the work load has to be shifted to
hyperimmunization (vaccines, DNCB) and adding additional methods of
reducing immune anergy.
I normally don't post on therapies that most members can't afford or
obtain. I may have access to some things that others don't, but
there are still many things that I can't get or use. I started to
try to make Gc-MAF, but the time and expense did not fit into the
doable for me. I spoke with Yamamoto about working with me on it,
but he seems mostly retired. One of our board members is trying to
get a grant through an ex-congressman who has access to large funds
and that might make GcMAF doable. There are others who have been
making claims that they have GcMAF, but I want to see proof.
I cannot get large amounts of GM-CSF (not to be confused with GcMAF)
for a reasonable price. The costs are piddling compared to what is
usually spent on chemotherapy, but the amounts required to use this
as curative standalone therapy are enormous for those paying out of pocket.
I am not recommending my strategies for everyone. Each has to be
based on the specific needs of the patient. This often includes lab
testing for blood levels of different kinds of mycoplasma. This
testing is not done in the US as far as I know, although forms of
this have been used to test with Gulf War Illness patients, chronic
fatigue, etc.
I do have more success than others and much of this is due to
prescreening. I don't touch those cases that are acute, where the
problem is largely mechanical (such as an obstruction)
irreversible decompensation in an essential organ, or anyone who is
too opinionated/
reluctant to work with children, with certain sarcomas, and I don't
work with those who mindlessly flit from therapy to therapy.
As a group those who do the best are the professional middle
class. They tend to be far more skilled at using their brains in
their defense. If lab testing shows that sialic acid is contributing
to their problem and they don't want to use a vaccine, then they can
zero in on the use of certain non-pathogenic vibrio or perhaps
certain forms of the ellagitannins. If they can't get dipyridamole
they can look at the similar mechanism of action of heparin. For
PARP inhibitors they can look at niacinamide. If they can't get
miltefosine they can see if their insurance covers edelfosine or
other alkyl-lysophospholi
vitamin D can be used.
There are those who don't understand what I do. They want me tell
them what to do. I don't do that. There are tens of thousands of
others who love to do that, both conventional and alternative. All I
do is help them cast a much wider net and then teach them how to use
their reasoning skills to winnow the list to those therapies that are
affordable and doable.
In determining these issues liability can be a very important
consideration. Tony Isaacs on this list has been very generous with
his advice on the use of oleander. He is probably legally in the
clear with the information he provides, but there is no question it
is toxic and this can vary from person to person and then there are
some real jerks out there who just can't take personal responsibility
-- and they will sue. I get a legal lecture every morning from my
wife who is a judge and who has yanked a number of licenses.
Vincent
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
No comments:
Post a Comment